A Black Male Feminist’s Guide to Anti-Misogynist Black Politics
(AKA: Why We Can’t Support Chris Brown)
By Frank Leon Roberts
Written for The Daily Voice
(AKA: Why We Can’t Support Chris Brown)
By Frank Leon Roberts
Written for The Daily Voice
Plain, Conversational Responses to Misogyny:
Misogynist Myth 1:
“Chris Brown is a good kid. Something must have really pushed him over the edge. He does not deserve to be dragged through the mud like this. Black men are always being represented as extra-sexist, which isn’t fair. Overall Chris Brown is great role model for black men. ”
Whenever we dare to critique black male sexism or misogyny, we are immediately told that such critiques are "wrong" because they run the risk of representing black men in a "negative" light. The time has come to move beyond these sort of Clarence Thomas politics. When black men---regardless of their class, sexual orientation, or profession----abuse a woman, it is intolerable, unacceptable, and must be aggressively denounced. Period.
We know this story all too well. When Clarence did it, it was “Anita’s fault.” When O.J. did it, it was “white people’s fault.” When R. Kelly “did it” it was those “jealous hoes’ fault.”
When will be allowed to denounce black male misogyny without fear of losing our Blackness membership card?
Misogynist Myth 2:
Rihanna must have “Provoked” It. She “asked” for it.
Sometimes I wonder how black people would respond if white people suddenly started offering “justifications” for our antebellum, slave ass-whippings. I can just imagine it now, “Well Kunte actually deserved that bloody lash because I told his sneaky ass to stop stepping out of line in the cotton field!”
I’m being dangerously facetious here, but my point should be well taken. There is no such thing as a “justification” for an act of sexist violence. In the moment that a man’s hands come down upon a woman’s body, they are immediately rooted (even if inadvertently) to a longer history of sexism and misogyny; to a history which has systematically preconditioned us to believe that physical violence is both a sane and natural way to put a woman “in her place.”
If we are to move beyond the cults of sexism and misogyny that run rampant in many black romantic relationships, then we must free ourselves from the egregiously problematic notion that casual male violence against women is ever “justified.” Particularly when it involves a 6’2, 180 pound man against a 5’8, 120 pound (a size “2”) woman.
Misogynist Myth #3:
Well, both of them were in the wrong. Why are we focusing exclusively on Chris Brown’s wrong-doing? Clearly this man needs help. Should’nt we be trying to support Chris Brown and make sure that he gets the help that he needs?
Any politics of social justice that does not begin with a concern, first and foremost for those MOST disadvantaged (i.e. the BATTERED rather than the BATTERER; the ABUSED rather than the ABUSER; the VICTIM of Violence rather than simply the Perpetrator of it) is misguided, and surely doomed for failure. I continue to believe in the utility of a "bottom's up" approach to social justice.
Therefore, we should refuse to let our "concern" for Chris Brown's "needs" silence our outrage, disgust, and/or disapproval of his misogyny.
Can I get a womanist, feminist Amen? A Witness?


I am tired of hearing about this whole situation...can't wait for it to be over
Posted by
Unknown |
2/20/2009
ill give you my spiel a bit later....but all ill summarize for right now is.....this is the court of public opinion...in an environment such as this that we live in, violence is essentially unwarranted, and we are taught to live by the gender roles that we believe to be true...or in other words, men are seen as naturally more aggressive than females who are seen as delicate by nature. so for a man of Brown's caliber to hit a woman of Rihanna's stature, it's seen as wrong (although violence is wrong period)
I don't feel that you should ever let yourself get that mad as a male to where you put your hands on a female
Posted by
Eff Dee Aytche |
2/20/2009
This is the SUPREME reason WHY I just LOVE You, and have so Admired you since the end of 2005. HONESTLY, I feel that individuals are judging this situation from the stand-point of their own misguided realms of Acceptable vs. UnAcceptable behaviors.
Regardless of which 'Team' one is supporting, the Bottom-Line, ESPECIALLY after her 1st photo leaked this morning, is that Chris Brown lost control of himself. In so doing, he has now lost control of his stability as an entertainer, and his sought after compassions as a man. Women will NEVER look at him the same, cross-culturally.
He has abandoned the sanctions of universal acceptances of a Man's Role in a Romantic Relationship.
It's SAD that Public Opinion has formed while he is being forced to remain SILENT. At this point, a March 5th Trial is Pointless. He WILL Walk without doing any Hard Time, for Rihanna has NOT pressed ANY charges.
However, in the eyes of the Mass American Market, he is deemed GUILTY AS SIN.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/20/2009
Wow, great article. Very well stated points.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/20/2009
Great post Frank! Thank you so much!
Posted by
Marisol LeBron |
2/20/2009
AMEN.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/20/2009
Welcome back, babe!
I will be glad when the media let's these people's personal affairs stay personal. I am sure neither of those two want their business out in the streets. Can they get some privacy?
Posted by
Keisha Kornbread |
2/21/2009
Oh look who came out of sabbatical? lol. Its good to see you bro. I have to contend with gayte-keeper on this one. I do agree with you Frank. There should be no praise for Chris Brown's behavior and even Chris knows his actions were wrong. I also agree with Xem that the media hypes up EVERYTHING. While the photo on TMZ showed a battered Rihanna, they want to just make it seem like it is just HORRIBLE. And while the Act is horrible, the media HYPE is of course AS USUAL unneccessary. THERE ARE MORE PRESSING ISSUES AT HAND IN THIS COUNTRY. Unemployment, Stimulus bills, and the list continues.
Posted by
Unknown |
2/21/2009
No praise or judgment from me. I wasn't in the car. I don't know what happened.
Posted by
Freeleo |
2/22/2009
AMEN.
Posted by
syc |
2/22/2009
Frank,
May I cross post on my blog? I will give you full credit and imbed the url in the post.
Posted by
BLKSeaGoat |
2/23/2009
of course. not a problem man.
Posted by
the young people's professor |
2/23/2009
Great post Frank, glad you're back from your 'sabbatical' (you are back for good now, right? lol). I must say though ,that I disagree with your assertion that hitting a woman is an inherently sexist/misogynist act. I see what you're saying about the historical context of male-on-female violence as a means of subjugation, and obviously domestic abuse of any kind is reprehensible, but don't you think that there's a sexist implication/undertone in the "don't hit women" mantra? It kind of reinforces the inferiority of women - 'don't hit women, they can't defend themselves'. We should be speaking out against violence in general, not just violence against women. Chris was wrong to hit Rihanna not because she's a woman, but because she's a human being! That's my take on it anyway.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/23/2009
I couldn't agree more Frank.
Posted by
edashiell |
2/24/2009
Frank, welcome back and it's good to read some of your columns again.
Mel Smith
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/24/2009
yes you can get a feminist, womanist, Nigerian dyke saying amen love. AMEN!
Posted by
daughter of my mama |
2/24/2009
Welcome back and WELL SAID Frank!!I couldn't agree more and I'm glad that you posted this.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/26/2009
I found the article problematic on a few levels, but agreed with the first myth in its notation of a lynching mentality. It makes it a problem to see those run to his side, because there is a claim he was provoked. I think that sexist misogyny has a tendency to relate too specifically to male and female (hetero-normative) relationships, but violence in any capacity is not the best way to handle a situation. Too many others are making this argument about sex and race. The real issue is more specifically violence and gender. A discourse that should be about masculine and feminine, because if Rhianna was much larger than Chris Brown and an aggressor how would we then deal with this situation. I am not one to work in hypothetical circumstances often, but for a media situation where the details become less specific(yet information is continually leaked) everyone seems to have such strong opinions. It also has to take into consideration how two young pop stars have to cope with a relationship with each other, and please no citations of Justin and Britney(look at the aftermath of that relationship). I support the victim in situations such as these, but with circumstances like these Chris has been a very irresponsible person. He did not handle the apology or acknowledgment of his wrong doing in the appropriate manner and this very action leads to a notion of needed guidance. And if I choose a team I advocate them both, because he's obviously young and misguided, but this brand of disgust is obviously not a problem solving just an affect to a situation.
Posted by
Anonymous |
2/26/2009
It's a good article Frank and welcome back. However I am so over this story. Especially now that they are back together it;s like for real?
Posted by
Kyon Saucier |
2/27/2009
Always compare the excuse to a "racist" excuse, and you'll see instantly the hidden woman hating that men love to justify.
White man beats an uppity black man for getting out of line, perfectly supported circa 1853. Black man beating up or hitting a girl friend, well she started it.
When black men speak up against woman hatred, woman beating by men, and violence of men, black men will become stronger not weaker.
Any black man who can be a feminist is a strong man in my opinion, and any men who speak up amongst other men about the complete unacceptability of violence against women are the brave ones!
Posted by
Anonymous |
3/02/2009
This comment has been removed by the author.
Posted by
by THE MADAM OF BLOG and BLAB |
3/28/2009
MISOGYNIST
SYLLABICATION: mi·sog·y·nist
NOUN: One who hates women.
ADJECTIVE: Of or characterized by a hatred of women.
Your site was recommended from a friend abroad.
I'll be back ... like your style.
Posted by
by THE MADAM OF BLOG and BLAB |
3/28/2009
First of all, I'd like to say how much I appreciate men like yourself who aren't afraid of identifying themselves as feminists, and who stand up for us women. Thank you.
And I completely agree. I was appalled at how many WOMEN believe that Rihanna provoked the attack. There is absolutely no excuse for what he did, especially considering how FAR he took it.
Some women just accept these things as a part of life, and so have little sympathy towards others who have been abused, which makes me sad because a) they've probably experienced abuse themselves, and b) they don't realize how strong and precious they really are, and how they deserve to be treated respectfully by a man.
Posted by
goldandsilver |
4/15/2009